data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce13a/ce13a337c4c19789e6fb735687cf72802038e04a" alt=""
The furthest right politically has a reconstructionist world view and the furthest left has a liberation one. Reconstruction says that we can bring in the kingdom of God on this earth through enacting something as close as possible to the Old Testament law. Liberation says that we can bring in the kingdom through progressive social policies that would liberate the poor and oppressed. Both focus on injustice. The first says we bring in the kingdom with enforced morality. The second says that we set up God's throne by giving the poor a fair shake. Both of them involve an allegorial intepretation of the Bible. Both of them allegorize the literal, thousand year reign of Christ on earth, a position called amillennialism. With both views, Jesus brings in the kingdom, but He does it spiritually through his agents on this earth. Reconstructionism has very conservative ambassadors and liberation theology has extremely liberal representatives.
Both of these thoughts have seeped into modern thinking in churches. Churches attempt to reform people through their standards or they try to change them by giving them things. The Bible is clear, however, that Jesus Christ, the Messiah, will set up a literal, physical kingdom on this earth. He will end the problems of poverty, injustice, and unrighteousness. Scripture contains lots of great teaching on the kingdom, but a wonderful synopsis of His kingdom comes in Isaiah 11:1-9. Jesus wants to rule and reign in people's lives today spiritually in prospect of a future physical kingdom on this earth. The changes people covet will actually come through the powerful transformation of Jesus Christ, first in the soul and then physically. He will completely change societal structure, reconstruction, and liberate everyone from their former oppressed condition. Until then, let's keep marching to Zion.
No comments:
Post a Comment