This entire 21-part study appears on the FaithSaves.net website in a study entitled “Hannah Whitall Smith: Higher Life Writer, Speaker on Sanctification, Developer of the Keswick Theology, Quaker Quietist and Universalist Heretic.” Click here to read the entire study.
Search for:
“While Mr. Smith most clearly spread Foster’s filthy doctrine in private to a variety of his followers, usually women, he did publicly proclaim with clarity the necessity of a post-conversion Spirit baptism as the climax of the Higher Life, while pointing publicly to its sexual nature only in a guarded way.”
to read the section that was in the blog post below.
11 comments:
It appears to me that, as bizarre as this seems, this teaching is not absent from some independent baptist churches yet today. Today's installment brings to mind what I have heard about Jack Schaap's preaching. I don't know if he believed this stuff, but some of it does sound quite similar.
Bro. Ross, your first footnote refers to Evan Roberts. Is this going to be clarified in next week's installment? Or, is the reference to something in the source referred to? Thanks.
The more I study the Bible and hear of the histories of some of the more famous "revivals" and "revivalists," the more skeptical I become. I don't know if that is one of the purposes of your writing or not.
Dear Pastor Voegtlin,
Thanks for the comment. I agree that there are things taught by Baptists today about Spirit baptism with which the Holy Spirit would not be pleased. I don't know if Schapp is tied in to Mrs. Smith with his overly explicit teaching or not; if there was proof of a connection, I would be interested, but I am not aware of any.
I discuss Evan Roberts, Jessie Penn-Lewis, and the Welsh Revival of 1904-1905 here:
http://faithsaves.net/evan-roberts-jessie-penn-lewis-welsh-revival/
Here is an excerpt on what many Baptists and others in Wales thought about the Keswick preacher Evan Roberts--namely, that he quenched and destroyed the genuine revival that was going on in Wales by bringing in fanaticism:
The evangelical Congregationalist minister Peter Price “believed a genuine revival was taking place apart from Roberts’ activities”[446] and “stated that Roberts’s emphasis on direct and unmediated divine inspiration denied the need for the objective preaching of the person and work of Christ and so created ‘a sham revival,’ which was hindering ‘the true revival’ that had long preceded Roberts’ work.”[447] For example, “for nearly two years the Revival flame was ablaze in Cardiganshire . . . before Evan Roberts was heard of . . . and it was a pure work of God in that county. That pure stream became impure under the hoof of the enemy” as Roberts’ methods took hold.[448] In Price’s important “letter to the Western Mail . . . he wrote that there were two revivals in Wales, one a true revival based on the substitutionary atonement of Christ and the other a sham revival based on emotionalism for which Evan Roberts was the major spokesman.”[449]
Price wrote:
I write the following in the interest of the religion of Jesus Christ, and because I sympathize with visitors who come from long distances to see the Revival in South Wales.
Now, I think I can claim that I have had as good an opportunity as most people to understand what is really going on in South Wales; and I have come to the conclusion that there are two so-called Revivals going on amongst us. The one, undoubtedly, from above—Divine, real, intense in nature, and Cymric[450] in its form. . . . the real Divine thing. . . .
[But] people . . . may attempt to make the thing, and lo! there comes out a calf and not a God. . . . Those who will do this are the shallow ones, the noisy ones, those who think themselves filled the most with the Spirit, but who are the least. They are, in fact, the imitators, who say, “There’s something wrong here. The Spirit is not here. I have had a vision[”] . . . the stock sayings of Evan Roberts . . . [also] repeated . . . by . . . [his] imitators[.] . . . Others may be found imitating his bodily contortions, sighs, etc. This mimicry is . . . done by the would-be Evan Robertses quite as much for their own sakes as for the sake of their visitors. Breaking into song while another prays, or speaks, or preaches, is another form of the attempt to imitate Evan Roberts’s meetings.
But these things are merely the accidents of the true Revival, and form no part of its kernel. For there is a kernel, which is overwhelming in its Divine power, and many thousands have experienced it, and there are ample signs that many thousands more will be touched by it.
There is, then, a Revival which is of God—of God alone—yes, a most mighty—an Almighty Revival . . . due to the earnest prayers of godly men and women for many years, and also to the extremely earnest preaching of the Gospel, emphasizing especially the Atonement, meaning by the Atonement the substitutionary death of our Lord Jesus Christ for the sins of the world.
Some preachers, again, laid great emphasis upon the Person and ministry of the Holy Ghost. Others, again, gave attention to the ethical aspect of our religion, but with less effect, in my opinion, as far as the present Revival is concerned. I have witnessed bursts of this real Revival as far back as two years ago. I understand that there are several would-be originators of the Revival; but I maintain that the human originator of the true Revival cannot be named. And this, to me, is one of the proofs that it is of Divine origin. I have witnessed indescribable scenes of this real Revival, effects that can never be put on paper. Hence, I have a right to say that the real Revival has not been and cannot be reported.
But there is another Revival in South Wales—a sham Revival, a mockery, a blasphemous travesty of the real thing. The chief figure in this mock Revival is Evan Roberts, whose language is inconsistent with the character of anyone except that of a person endowed with the attributes of a Divine Being. If not, what is he? Are there four persons in the Godhead, and is Evan Roberts the fourth? If so, I would call him the Commander of the Third Person, or the Master of the Spirit, for the . . . words which I myself heard from him on Monday night last at Bethania Chapel, Dowlais. The Spirit being somewhat reluctant to obey him, he said, “He must come”; but the Spirit (of whom he talked most glibly, just as a child speaks of its toy, but somewhat more off-handedly) would not obey the orders. . . . [H]e spoke as if the Spirit was entirely in his grip . . . judging by his behaviour and talk, the Holy Spirit is led by Evan Roberts!
My honest conviction is this; that the best thing that could happen to the cause of the true religious Revival amongst us would be for Evan Roberts and his girl-companions to withdraw into their respective homes, and there to examine themselves, and learn a little more of the meaning of Christianity, if they have the capacity for this, instead of going about the country pretending to show the Way of Life to people many of whom know a thousand times more about it than they do. Why, we have scores of young colliers in Dowlais with whom Evan Roberts is not to be compared either in intellectual capacity or spiritual power.
But it is this mock Revival—this exhibition—this froth—this vain trumpery—which visitors see and which newspapers report. And it is harmful to the true Revival—very harmful. And I am horrified lest people who trust to what they see at Evan Roberts’s meetings and to newspaper reports should identify the two Revivals—the true and the false—the Heavenly fire and the ignis fatuus.
Before Evan Roberts visited Dowlais, we had the holy fire burning brightly—at white heat; and at my own church alone we could count our converts during the last five or six months by the hundreds. But what happened when Evan Roberts visited the place? People came from all parts anxious to see the man, to understand something of the movement, and to get some of the fire to take home with them. I suppose that most of them did see the man; but I doubt whether they understood the movement—even the mock movement. They had no chance to understand the true movement, nor had they a chance of catching any of the true fire, for it wasn’t there. I will say that with much effort Evan Roberts, together with his co-operators (and, evidently, they understand one another thoroughly, and each knew his or her part well and where to come in), managed, by means of threats, complaints and incantations, which reminded me of the prophets of Baal, to create some of the false fire. But never in my life did I experience such agony—the whole procedure being utterly sacrilegious. I should say that Evan Roberts must have seen and felt that he was a failure at Dowlais; but to cover the circumstance of failure, there appeared in the paper, after he had proved himself so, a prophecy concerning certain misgivings of his as to whether he ought to have undertaken a mission to Dowlais.
I should like to ask Evan Roberts a few questions; I have many more which I might ask; but I will be satisfied now with a few: . . . He said that there was someone in the lobby who was accepting Christ; but no one did. What Spirit told him this lie? . . . Why does he wait until the meetings attain the climax of enthusiasm before he enters? If help is valuable at any stage, is it not mostly so at the commencement, in order to kindle the fire? . . . Why does he visit places where the fire has been burning at maximum strength for weeks and months? Would it not be more reasonable for him to go to places which the fire has not reached? . . . What spirit makes him bad-tempered when things don’t come about exactly as he wishes? . . . What spirit makes him say, “Ask God to damn the people if you don’t ask anything else?”
“Yes, but he has a lovely face and a beautiful smile,” so some women say. This is the last resort.
May I repeat that I have written the above in the interest of the religion of Jesus Christ, and out of sympathy with visitors who come to see the Revival. I may have to suffer persecution for writing the above—even by Spirit-filled (!) men; but I don’t seek the renown of the martyr; still, if martyrdom for the truth be necessary, I am ready. To the true Revival—the gloriously real Revival—I will say and pray with all my soul,
“Cerdd ymlaen, nefol dân”
But to the bogus Revival I will say with all my soul,
“Cerdd yn ol, gnawdol dân.”
Peter Price, January 31, 1905[451]
Thus, there was a real revival in Wales (Baptists had the most church growth through it, not the Calvinistic Methodists who get most of the attention) but the Keswick preacher Evan Roberts largely quenched it and replaced it with confusion, so that, although Baptist church membership had been growing for many years in Wales, after Roberts ended his course in Wales Baptist church membership, and that of evangelical Protestantism, began a decades-long decline that eventually left Wales the spiritual wasteland it is today. Only Pentecostalism--which arose out of the false revivalism of Evan Roberts and others in Wales--boomed.
Thanks for the comment.
Tom,
The link "http://faithsaves.net/evan-roberts-jessie-penn-lewis-welsh-revival/" is faulty or at least on my screen it says something like Error 404 or Page not found. Can you please get us a corrected link. I would like to read that article. Thanks for writing about this topic. Amazingly helpful and shockingly sad at the same time. IMO.
With gratitude,
Bill
Dear Bro Billy,
I have changed the link here:
http://faithsaves.net/evan-roberts-jessie-penn-lewis-welsh-revival/
into three parts, one on Evan Roberts, one on Jessie Penn-Lewis, and one on the Welsh Revival of 1904-1905. They can all be accessed here:
http://faithsaves.net/soteriology/
or here:
http://faithsaves.net/evan-roberts/
http://faithsaves.net/welsh-revival/
http://faithsaves.net/jessie-penn-lewis/
now.
Thank you, my Brother.
Do you know where Robert was buried? Cremated? Hannah appears to have cremated. Thank you. Wm Snider wsnider2@aol.com
Dear wmsnider,
I have no idea. If you find out, please let me know. I am interested in your source for Hannah being cremated also.
Thanks.
Post a Comment