Note: The Greek in this post may become garbled unless you have Accordance Bible Software Greek fonts. You can download a trial version of Accordance free here and get the fonts with the free download if you wish.
The oil of James 5:14-20 is medicinal. Medicinal oil was very frequently used in ancient times. In James 5, since “anointing” (aÓlei÷yanteß) is a participle
dependent upon the imperative “let them pray” (proseuxa¿sqwsan), the use of medicine, as the oil is here used as a
medical instrument, is required.
Faith Cure advocates and Pentecostals who contend that one must follow
the procedure of James 5:14-15 in healing, but either reject the use
of medicine or affirm that its use is only optional, disobey James 5. Nobody has been led by the Holy Spirit to
reject the use of the best medical means available for healing because of James
5:14-15, since the Spirit required the use of medicine in the passage. Nonetheless, while both prayer and
medicine are enjoined, the emphasis of James is on prayer rather than upon the
medical anointing with oil, since “let them pray” is the specific command and
“anointing” is a subordinate participle.
Sometimes good medical means are not available, but the believer always
can and should pray.
“The
word aleipsantes (‘anoint’) is not the usual word for
sacramental or ritualistic anointing. James could have used the verb chrio if that had been what he had in mind. The distinction
is still observed in modern Greek, with aleipho meaning
‘to daub,’ ‘to smear,’ and chrio
meaning ‘to anoint.’ Furthermore, it is a well-documented fact that oil was one
of the most common medicines of biblical times. See Isaiah 1:6 and Luke 10:34.
Josephus (Antiq. XVII, 172 [vi. 5]) reports that during his last illness Herod
the Great was given a bath in oil in hopes of effecting a cure. The papyri,
Philo, Pliny, and the physician Galen all refer to the medicinal use of oil.
Galen described it as ‘the best of all remedies for paralysis’ (De
Simplicium Medicamentorum Temperamentis 2.10ff). It is evident, then, that
James is prescribing prayer and medicine. . . . In answer to ‘the prayer
offered in faith,’ God uses the medicine to cure the malady” (Expositor’s
Bible Commentary, gen. ed. Frank E.
Gaebelein, on James 5:14-15).
“The
oil specified was olive oil (elaion)
which was freely available . . . [and] was used for dietetic, toilet and
medical purposes. There is no
indication that the oil needed to be specially consecrated fro its use in
anointing the sick. Two different
words are used for the application of oil in the New Testament. Aleipho is the humbler one and usually means to apply oil for
toilet purposes (Matt. 6.17, Luke 7.46).
Chrio is the ritual and
official word for anointing and is used only in the figurative sense of
anointing by God. Here in James
the humbler word is used. . . . [A]n analysis of the usage of the verb aleipho in the New Testament appears to support the medical
view [of James 5:14] rather than the religious one. . . . It is never used in
the gospels of anointing for a religious purpose, but only for toilet or medical
purposes. . . . Anointing with oil . . . was used only for the healing of
physical disease in the New Testament. . . . James was saying that normal
medical methods should be used in the name of the Lord and based on prayer . .
. we may translate [the relevent] clause in verse 14 as ‘Giving him his
medicine in the name of the Lord.’ . . . James held that healing should be a
combination of medical and non-medical methods, and in illustration referrred
to a contemporary medical method of anointing with oil which he said should be
used in the name of the Lord and with prayer. . . . [In] James’ reference to
anointing with oil . . . he is here recommending the employment of both
physical and non-physical methods of healing. . . . [Methods of] medical
healing . . . are God’s gifts to suffering humanity and are to be used in
healing the sick” (pgs. 338-339, 343, “Healing in the Epistle of James,” John
Wilkinson. Scottish Journal of Theology 24 (1971) 326–45).
The
verb "anoint," aleipho, appears in Matt 6:17; Mark 6:13; 16:1; Luke 7:38, 46; John 11:2; 12:3;
James 5:14. In all of these texts,
the anointing is not ceremonial, with the sole possible exception of Mark
6:13; but note even on that verse: “Oil was used medicinally in OT times
(Is. 1:6; Jer. 8:22; 51:8) as in other ancient societies, and the action of the
Samaritan in pouring oil and wine on the wounds of the traveller in Jesus’
parable (Lk. 10:34) was probably common practice. It may be, therefore, that
the disciples’ use of oil was purely a pragmatic, medical measure” (The
Gospel of Mark : A Commentary on the Greek Text, R. T. France, on Mark 6:13). Note also in the LXX Ruth 3:3; 2 Samuel 12:20; 14:2; 2 Kings
4:2; 2 Chronicles 28:15; Esther 2:12; Daniel 10:3; Micah 6:15; Judith 16:8
(however, note also Genesis 31:13; Exodus 40:15 (yet also note cri√sma later in the verse); Numbers 3:3). Contrast the ceremonial emphasis in the
New Testament uses of cri÷w: Luke 4:18; Acts 4:27;
10:38; 2 Corinthians 1:21; Hebrews 1:9, an emphasis which is the strongly
dominant use in the LXX (Exodus 28:41; 29:2, 7, 29, 36; 30:26, 30, 32; 40:9–10,
13; Leviticus 4:3; 6:13; 7:36; 8:11–12; 16:32; Numbers 6:15; 7:1, 10, 84, 88;
35:25; Deuteronomy 28:40; Judges 9:8, 15; 1 Samuel 9:16; 10:1; 11:15; 15:1, 17;
16:3, 12–13; 2 Samuel 1:21; 2:4, 7; 5:3, 17; 12:7; 19:11; 1 Kings 1:34, 39, 45;
5:15; 19:15–16; 2 Kings 9:3, 6, 12; 11:12; 23:30; 1 Chronicles 11:3; 14:8;
29:22; 2 Chronicles 23:11; 36:1 Psalm 26:1; 44:8; 88:21; 151:4; Hosea 8:10;
Amos 6:6; Isaiah 25:6; 61:1; Jeremiah 22:14; Ezekiel 16:9; 43:3; Sirach 45:15;
46:13; 48:8), although there are a few exceptions, some of which are only
possibly exceptions, or alternative uses (such as painting a house, Jeremiah
22:14; cf. also Deuteronomy 28:40; Isaiah 25:6; Jeremiah 22:14; Ezekiel 16:9; 44:3;
Judith 10:3). Thus, while it is
true that anointing with oil at times is used to represent the Holy Spirit, one
would expect cri÷w rather than aÓlei÷fw in James 5:14 if pneumatic typology was the intended
emphasis.
For
examples of the medical use of oil, note in Josephus:
But
now Herod’s distemper greatly increased upon him after a severe manner, and
this by God’s judgment upon him for his sins: for a fire glowed in him slowly,
which did not so much appear to the touch outwardly as it augmented his pains
inwardly; for it brought upon him a vehement appetite to eating, which he could
not avoid to supply with one sort of food or other. His entrails were also
exulcerated, and the chief violence of his pain lay on his colon; an aqueous
and transparent liquor also settled itself about his feet, and a like matter
afflicted him at the bottom of his belly. Nay, farther, his privy member was
putrified, and produced worms; and when he sat upright he had a difficulty of
breathing, which was very loathsome, on account of the stench of his breath,
and the quickness of its returns; he had also convulsions in all parts of his
body, which increased his strength to an insufferable degree. It was said by
those who pretended to divine, and who were endowed with wisdom to foretell
such things, that God inflicted this punishment on the king on account of his
great impiety; yet was he still in hopes of recovering, though his afflictions
seemed greater than anyone could bear. He also sent for physicians, and did not
refuse to follow what they prescribed for his assistance; and went beyond the
river Jordan, and bathed himself in warm baths that were at Calirrhoe, which,
besides their other general virtues, were also fit to drink; which water runs
into the lake called Asphaltitis. And when the physicians once thought fit to
have him bathed in a vessel full of oil, it was supposed that he was just
dying; but, upon the lamentable cries of his domestics, he revived; and having
no longer the least hopes of recovering, he gave order that every soldier
should be paid fifty drachmae; and he also gave a great deal to their
commanders, and to his friends, and came again to Jericho, where he grew so
choleric, that it brought him to do all things like a madman; and though he
were near his death, he contrived the following wicked designs.
168 ÔHrw¿dhØ de« meizo/nwß hJ no/soß e˙nepikrai÷neto di÷khn
w±n paranomh/seien e˙kprassome÷nou touv qeouv puvr me«n ga»r malako\n h™n oujc
w—de pollh\n aÓposhmai√non toi√ß e˙pafwme÷noiß th\n flo/gwsin oJpo/shn toi√ß
e˙nto\ß proseti÷qei th\n ka¿kwsin
169 e˙piqumi÷a de« deinh\ touv de÷xasqai÷ ti aÓp∆ aujtouv ouj ga»r h™n
mh\ oujc uJpourgei√n kai« eºlkwsiß tw◊n te e˙nte÷rwn kai« ma¿lista touv ko/lou
deinai« aÓlghdo/neß kai« fle÷gma uJgro\n peri« tou\ß po/daß kai« diauge÷ß
paraplhsi÷a de« kai« peri« to\ h™tron ka¿kwsiß h™n nai« mh\n kai« touv
ai˙doi÷ou shvyiß skw¿lhkaß e˙mpoiouvsa pneu/mato/ß te ojrqi÷a e¶ntasiß kai«
aujth\ li÷an aÓhdh\ß aÓcqhdo/ni te thvß aÓpofora◊ß kai« twˆ◊ puknwˆ◊ touv
a‡sqmatoß e˙spasme÷noß te peri« pa◊n h™n me÷roß i˙scu\n oujc uJpomenhth\n
prostiqe÷menoß. 170 e˙le÷geto ou™n uJpo\ tw◊n qeiazo/ntwn kai« oi–ß tauvta
proapofqe÷ggesqai sofi÷aˆ pro/keitai poinh\n touv pollouv dussebouvß tau/thn oJ
qeo\ß ei˙spra¿ssesqai para» touv basile÷wß 171 kai÷per de« meizo/nwß h£ aÓnti÷scoi a‡n tiß
talaipwrou/menoß e˙n e˙lpi÷di touv aÓnasfalouvntoß h™n i˙atrou/ß te metape÷mpwn
kai« oJpo/sa aÓrwga» uJpagoreu/seian crhvsqai mh\ aÓpotetramme÷noß potamo/n te
pera¿saß ∆Iorda¿nhn qermoi√ß toi√ß kata» Kallirro/hn auJto\n paredi÷dou a‚per
su\n thØv e˙ß pa¿nta aÓrethØv kai« po/tima¿ e˙stin e¶xeisin de« to\ u¢dwr
touvto ei˙ß li÷mnhn th\n aÓsfaltofo/ron legome÷nhn 172 kaÓntauvqa toi√ß i˙atroi√ß dokhvsan wJ/ste aÓnaqa¿lpein
aujto/n kaqeqei«ß ei˙ß pu/elon ple÷wn e˙lai÷ou do/xan metasta¿sewß e˙nepoi÷hsen
aujtoi√ß tw◊n de« oi˙ketw◊n oi˙mwghØv crwme÷nwn perienegkw»n kai« mhd∆ h¢ntina
aÓmfi« touv swqhsome÷nou e˙lpi÷da e¶cwn toi√ß stratiw¿taiß aÓna» penth/konta
dracma»ß e˚ka¿stwˆ keleu/ei nemhqhvnai
173 polla» de« kai« toi√ß hJgemo/sin aujtw◊n kai« fi÷loiß toi√ß aujtouv
e˙dwrei√to kai« parhvn au™qiß e˙pi« ÔIericouvntoß me÷laina¿ te aujto\n hØ¢rei
colh\ e˙pi« pa◊sin e˙xagriai÷nousa wJ/ste dh\ teleutw◊n pra◊xin toia¿nde
e˙pinoei√. (Antiquities 17:168-173)
Again,
Josephus recorded concerning the death of Herod:
After
this, the distemper seized upon his whole body, and greatly disordered all its
parts with various symptoms; for there was a gentle fever upon him, and an
intolerable itching over all the surface of his body, and continual pains in
his colon, and dropsical tumors about his feet and an inflammation of the
abdomen,—and a putrefication of his privy member, that produced worms. Besides
which he had a difficulty of breathing upon him, and could not breathe but when
he sat upright, and had a convulsion of all his members; insomuch that the
diviners said those diseases were a punishment upon him for what he had done to
the rabbis. Yet did he struggle with his numerous disorders, and still had a
desire to live, and hoped for recovery, and considered of several methods of
cure. Accordingly, he went over Jordan, and made use of those hot baths at
Callirrhoe, which run into the lake Asphaltitis, but are themselves sweet
enough to be drank. And here the physicians thought proper to bathe his whole
body in warm oil, by letting it down into a large vessel full of oil; whereupon
his eyes failed him, and he came and went as if he were dying, and as a tumult
was then made by his servants, at their voice he revived again. Yet did he
after this despair of recovery, and gave orders that each soldier should have
fifty drachmae apiece, and that his commanders and friends should have great
sums of money given them.
656 ⁄Enqen aujtouv to\ sw◊ma pa◊n hJ no/soß dialabouvsa poiki÷loiß
pa¿qesin e˙meri÷zeto pureto\ß me«n ga»r h™n ouj la¿broß knhsmo\ß de« aÓfo/rhtoß
thvß e˙pifanei÷aß o¢lhß kai« ko/lou sunecei√ß aÓlghdo/neß peri÷ te tou\ß po/daß
wJ/sper uJdrwpiw◊ntoß oi˙dh/mata touv te h¡trou flegmonh\ kai« dh\ ai˙doi÷ou
shpedw»n skw¿lhkaß gennw◊sa pro\ß tou/toiß ojrqo/pnoia kai« du/spnoia kai«
spasmoi« pa¿ntwn tw◊n melw◊n wJ/ste tou\ß e˙piqeia¿zontaß poinh\n ei•nai tw◊n
sofistw◊n ta» nosh/mata le÷gein 657 oJ de« palai÷wn tosou/toiß pa¿qesin o¢mwß touv
zhvn aÓntei÷ceto swthri÷an te h¡lpizen kai« qerapei÷aß e˙peno/ei diaba»ß gouvn
to\n ∆Iorda¿nhn toi√ß kata» Kallirro/hn e˙crhvto qermoi√ß tauvta d∆ e¶xeisi
me«n ei˙ß th\n ∆Asfalti√tin li÷mnhn uJpo\ gluku/thtoß d∆ e˙sti« kai« po/tima
do/xan de« e˙ntauvqa toi√ß i˙atroi√ß e˙lai÷wˆ qermwˆ◊ pa◊n aÓnaqa¿lyai to\
sw◊ma calasqe«n ei˙ß plh/rh pu/elon e˙klu/ei kai« tou\ß ojfqalmou\ß wJß
teqnew»ß aÓne÷streyen 658 qoru/bou de« tw◊n qerapeuo/ntwn genome÷nou
pro\ß me«n th\n fwnh\n aÓnh/negken ei˙ß de« to\ loipo\n aÓpognou\ß th\n
swthri÷an toi√ß te stratiw¿taiß aÓna» penth/konta dracma»ß e˙ke÷leusen
dianei√mai kai« polla» crh/mata toi√ß hJgemo/si kai« toi√ß fi÷loiß. (War
1:656-658)
Philo
wrote:
Again: why need we seek for more in the way of ointment than the
juice pressed out of the fruit of the olive? For that softens the limbs, and
relieves the labour of the body, and produces a good condition of the flesh;
and if anything has got relaxed or flabby, it binds it again, and makes it firm
and solid, and it fills us with vigour and strength of muscle, no less than any
other unguent.
ti÷ de« touv aÓpo\ thvß e˙lai÷aß e˙kqlibome÷nou
karpouv ple÷on e¶dei zhtei√n pro\ß aÓlei÷mmata; kai« ga»r leai÷nei kai«
ka¿maton sw¿matoß lu/ei kai« eujsarki÷an e˙mpoiei√, ka·n ei¶ ti kecalasme÷non
ei¶h, sfi÷ggei pukno/thti kai« oujdeno\ß h∞tton e˚te÷rou ÔRw¿mhn kai«
eujtoni÷an e˙nti÷qhsin. (Dreams 2:58)
Pliny,
in his Natural History
23:39-53 discusses in detail the “medicinal properties of the various kinds of
oil,” commenting on olive oil, green oil, castor oil, almond oil, laurel oil,
myrtle oil, cypress oil, citrus oil, walnut oil, oil of balsamum, radish oil,
sesame oil, palm oil, and many other types of oil, whether fresh or aged. His discussion underscores the very
significant medicinal use of oil in ancient medicine—sometimes in accordance
with what God has enabled science to verify experimentally today, and sometimes
not.
Patristic references to the medicinal use of oil include: “Antony, the great monk . . . rejected the practice of anointing with oil, and the use of baths and of similar luxuries likely to relax the tension of the body by moisture.” (Ecclesiastical History, Sozomen, Book 1:13); “Or what castle or house is beautiful and serviceable when it has not been anointed? And what man, when he enters into this life or into the gymnasium, is not anointed with oil? And what work has either ornament or beauty unless it be anointed and burnished?” (Theophilus of Antioch, Theophilus to Autolychus Book 1:12). Compare also the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, ed. Kittell, on aÓlei÷fw.
Lightfoot records the following material concerning medical anointing with oil from Jewish sources:
Patristic references to the medicinal use of oil include: “Antony, the great monk . . . rejected the practice of anointing with oil, and the use of baths and of similar luxuries likely to relax the tension of the body by moisture.” (Ecclesiastical History, Sozomen, Book 1:13); “Or what castle or house is beautiful and serviceable when it has not been anointed? And what man, when he enters into this life or into the gymnasium, is not anointed with oil? And what work has either ornament or beauty unless it be anointed and burnished?” (Theophilus of Antioch, Theophilus to Autolychus Book 1:12). Compare also the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, ed. Kittell, on aÓlei÷fw.
Lightfoot records the following material concerning medical anointing with oil from Jewish sources:
R. Simeon, the son of Eleazar, permitted R. Meir to
mingle wine and oil, and to anoint the sick on the sabbath. And he was once sick, and we sought to
do so to him, but he suffered us not.” [Talm. Jerus. In Berachoth, fol. 3, col.
1]
“A
tradition. Anointing on the
sabbath is permitted. If his head
ache, or if a scall come upon it, he anoints with oil.” [Id. In Maazar Sheni,
fol. 53, col. 3
“If
he be sick, or a scall be upon his head, he anoints according to the manner.”
[Talm. Bab. In Joma, fol. 77, 2.]
Lightfoot then comments:
[A]nointing with oil was an ordinary medical
application to the sick. . . . Now if we take the apostle’s counsel, as
referring to this medical practice, we may construe it, that he would have this
physical administration to be improved to the best advantage; namely, that whereas ‘anointing with
oil’ was ordinarily used to the sick, by way of physic—he adviseth that they
should send for the elders of the church to do it; not that the anointing was any more in their hand, than in
another’s, as to the thing itself, for it was still but a physical
application—but that they, with the applying of this corporal phsyic, might
also pray with and fro the patient, and apply the spiritual physic of good
admonition and comforts to him.
Which is much the same, as if . . . . a sick person should send for the
minister at taking of any physic, that he might pray with him, and counsel and
comfort him. . . . [The] [A]postle, seeing anointing was an ordinary and good
physic . . . directs them . . . to get the elders, or ministers of the church,
to come tot the sick, and to add, to the medical anointing of him, their godly
and ferbent prayers for him[.] (Pg. 316, The Whole Works of John Lightfoot, vol. 3, John Lightfoot, ed. John Rodgers Pitman. London: J. F. Dove, 1832.)
A search of the Talmuds of Jerusalem and Babylon will provide
further evidence of the sort set forth by Lightfoot.
It
is very noteworthy that the recorded and commended uses of oil for medicinal
purposes in the Bible are those for which there is a rational scientific
purpose (Luke 10:34; Isaiah 1:6, etc.).
The medically questionable or harmful uses that are mixed into
discussions such as that of Pliny are not commended in the Bible.
-TDR
No comments:
Post a Comment