Is this a person that we want in the Senate of the United States? She can't answer a simple question about an important issue. Notice that games she plays with language. Does anyone in the world want this kind of person to be in a position of power? Also witness the fact that she defines a baby born as one who is home from the hospital. I ask, "What about the health of a baby? Of a person who is outside of the mother, let alone conceived? You can read George Will's take on her here.
While the positions of Boxer, Feingold, and the rest are seriously distressing, the worst thing Will notes in that article is that the /Congressional Record/ varied from what Boxer actually said. When that kind of immediate revisionism can take place uncontested, we're toast.
2 comments:
While the positions of Boxer, Feingold, and the rest are seriously distressing, the worst thing Will notes in that article is that the /Congressional Record/ varied from what Boxer actually said. When that kind of immediate revisionism can take place uncontested, we're toast.
Something believers can/should do is print a tract such as "God's view of abortion" at http://sites.google.com/site/thross7/
and pass them out.
Post a Comment