tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post4642712458819936121..comments2023-12-22T08:29:29.230-08:00Comments on WHAT IS TRUTH: The Erroneous Epistemology of Multiple Version Onlyism part oneKent Brandenburghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13419354741455959191noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-89215769910418074812009-03-25T20:17:00.000-07:002009-03-25T20:17:00.000-07:00Thanks everyone who commented. I mean that. I ca...Thanks everyone who commented. I mean that. I can't take much time. I wrote this before I left on a road trip with our school in a fine arts and academic meet with another school all the way in Utah. It is a tradition with us every year.<BR/><BR/>Jason,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for posting. I wasn't done with this one, so I'll probably finish it before I answer you. And I won't be back until Saturday essentially. I may have two parts to this. You can tell it ended rather abruptly, or at least I thought it did.<BR/><BR/>Hello everyone else and thanks.Kent Brandenburghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13419354741455959191noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-88458835927534086822009-03-25T18:10:00.000-07:002009-03-25T18:10:00.000-07:00Kent,Looks like your blog doesn't allow trackbacks...Kent,<BR/><BR/>Looks like your blog doesn't allow trackbacks so here's a link to my response:<BR/><BR/>http://givemetruth.net/infocus/a-response-to-kent-brandenburgs-post-on-epistemology/Jasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11403876571610524450noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-46760431342961721502009-03-25T12:38:00.000-07:002009-03-25T12:38:00.000-07:00Pastor Brandenburg.. Thank you for this article. ...Pastor Brandenburg.. Thank you for this article. It is well written and easy for this layman to understand.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-29335756481027696452009-03-25T07:33:00.000-07:002009-03-25T07:33:00.000-07:00Thank you brother Brandenburg for an excellent, Sc...Thank you brother Brandenburg for an excellent, Scriptural argument. How grateful I am that we have an "unction and know all things" and an "anointing" and "need not that any man (unsaved man with "academic" "scientific" education) teach [us]", I John 2:20,27. It is also becoming more clear to me through these discussions that Revelation 22:18-19, though at first difficult to consider, actually do refer to textual critics. Then, again, back to I John 2:19 - "They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us." <BR/>G. WebbAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-66008165679088445822009-03-24T21:08:00.000-07:002009-03-24T21:08:00.000-07:00Chris:"Quite simply Jason and other open and avowe...Chris:<I>"Quite simply Jason and other open and avowed textual critics need to repent and be born again."</I><BR/><BR/>See? This is the type of comment that derails interesting and thought-provoking posts and comment threads into an epithet sling-fest.<BR/><BR/>Good article, Kent. I do agree with Chris on that.<BR/><BR/>Wallace's quote is down-right scary... <I>"investigate with as objective a mind as possible, allowing the evidence to lead where it will."</I> So evidence is the leader? And how objective does one's mind need to be in order to accurately examine the evidence? How can we know we are being reliably objective enough? So we can't be sure of God's word, but we can have faith in our own supposed objectivity?reglerjoehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15850185571444567195noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-19243001103039702252009-03-24T18:16:00.000-07:002009-03-24T18:16:00.000-07:00Chris stated, "Quite simply Jason and other open a...Chris stated, "Quite simply Jason and other open and avowed textual critics need to repent and be born again."<BR/><BR/>That is pure truth and the end of the whole matter.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-75359952534441830062009-03-24T11:40:00.000-07:002009-03-24T11:40:00.000-07:00Great Article!Here is my synopsis; Your epistemolo...Great Article!<BR/>Here is my synopsis; <BR/>Your epistemology (which is the correct one) is based upon faith in God's word. <BR/>Any other epistomology is based upon human reasoning and a "yea, hath God said,"<BR/> mentatlity. <BR/>Quite simply Jason and other open and avowed textual critics need to repent and be born again.<BR/><BR/>ChrisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com