tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post1695313094705368913..comments2023-12-22T08:29:29.230-08:00Comments on WHAT IS TRUTH: Daniel 3:25: “the Son of God” or “a son of the gods”?Kent Brandenburghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13419354741455959191noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-15096906937964075132020-10-27T19:37:19.676-07:002020-10-27T19:37:19.676-07:00Glad it is a blessing!
! I would suggest linking ...Glad it is a blessing!<br /><br />! I would suggest linking to the version accessible at faithsaves.net/Bibliology/ as the PDF file there doesn’t t have the Hebrew characters garbled.KJB1611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-86981721779120142682020-10-27T15:15:23.270-07:002020-10-27T15:15:23.270-07:00I will be linking to this article in my upcoming D...I will be linking to this article in my upcoming Daniel commentary "Desealing Daniel" concerning the true KJB reading of Daniel 3:25. Of course, the context is clear, but I appreciate the study and it is helpful. God bless you for this.Georgehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04223813994885613450noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-62141871738073257752018-08-03T19:48:10.294-07:002018-08-03T19:48:10.294-07:00Dear Mr. Gonzalez,
I am not completely sure what ...Dear Mr. Gonzalez,<br /><br />I am not completely sure what you are saying, but the Bible is very clear that Michael the Archangel is only "one of the chief princes" (Daniel 10:13), while the Son of God, as He is the eternal Deity, is not "one of" a group of princes but is exalted high above every other (Php 2:5-11). Christ is definitely not Michael the Archangel.<br /><br />It sounds like you are involved in a false religion. Please see:<br /><br /><br />http://faithsaves.net/different-religions/<br /><br />If you are a Seventh Day Adventist, please read "Bible Truths for Seventh Day Adventist Friends" here:<br /><br />http://faithsaves.net/seventh-day-sabbath/<br /><br />Thank you.<br /><br /><br />Of course, the Hebrew word malach and the Greek word angelos simply refer to a messenger, to the Messenger of Jehovah in the Old Testament can be the preincarnate Christ without making Him into a created being.KJB1611https://www.blogger.com/profile/09696273086955004524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-5093601780865765052018-08-02T19:45:59.572-07:002018-08-02T19:45:59.572-07:00Enlightenment can only be brought in this manner. ...Enlightenment can only be brought in this manner. You have to remove every teaching you've ever been taught. What am I about to say is going to seem rather extreme to all of you but very much the truth. There are Jewish teachings that teach the same story but instead of the Son of God that has the Archangel Michael in the furnace. Jesus is both The Lion and the lamb the lion being the Archangel and the lamb being the Messiah. The two chief princesses. now I know what everyone is going to say, angels are created beings and therefore cannot be like God we are made better than them because we are of flash. I get that but I also get not to question God "I am what I am" those are his words. Look at the reading from The Book of Life on the day of final judgment Jesus is there, Michael the Archangel is as well. And something I learned in Reading in Revelations recently is that when he stands all judgment and mercy cease I don't know if any of you gentlemen can honestly say that you have authority or are made better. Everyone's going to want to argue and say something that they were taught I'll ask each one of you before you bring your points to do the research on who the Archangel really is and also pray to God to give you peace or what is truly correct for I am merely a man and man will lead you astray every single time. Go to seek God's word remember it's mainly in the old Testament. I hope this brings a light mint and I hope everyone has a blessed dayAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06578236204076132093noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-77583713245793749902014-01-26T13:32:47.298-08:002014-01-26T13:32:47.298-08:00Daniel 3:25 is correct in the KJV without a doubt....Daniel 3:25 is correct in the KJV without a doubt. Many focus only on 3:25. Look at the key word in that sentence "LIKE" He was not 100% so much so that in Daniel 3:28 Nebuchadnezzar says "his angel." <br /><br />I do agree the NIV, ESV and others have some nerve to change the obvious in that verse 3:25<br /><br /> <br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-58365667303442618202013-08-13T22:42:09.576-07:002013-08-13T22:42:09.576-07:00Dear George,
There is no textual variant in Danie...Dear George,<br /><br />There is no textual variant in Daniel 3:25. The question is one of translation, not of textual variation in this verse.<br /><br />Furthermore, the King James is correct and Daniel 3:25 because it is a correct translation of the Hebrew, so showing that this is the case is valuable.<br /><br />Finally, posts that end with TDR are written by Thomas Ross, not by Kent Brandenburg.<br /><br />Thanks for the comment.<br /><br />TDRKJB1611https://www.blogger.com/profile/09696273086955004524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-28092894180188650842013-08-11T05:23:45.495-07:002013-08-11T05:23:45.495-07:00Brother Kent,
You did not need to waste a bunch o...Brother Kent,<br /><br />You did not need to waste a bunch of good space with that "language study". Anyone reading IN CONTEXT Daniel 3 can simply come to the conclusion that "the Son of God" MUST be correct. The reading "a son of the gods" is of the devil and any Hebrew manuscript that reads as such is corrupt.<br /><br />You see, the English King James Bible being the very words of God today would be used to determine the correct Hebrew or Greek text.The Preacherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00555338497068482867noreply@blogger.com