tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post1536187081156925222..comments2023-12-22T08:29:29.230-08:00Comments on WHAT IS TRUTH: The Budwig Protocol: Deadly Cancer QuackeryKent Brandenburghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13419354741455959191noreply@blogger.comBlogger41125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-37871189137773467022021-07-02T08:12:19.682-07:002021-07-02T08:12:19.682-07:00Hm? With the moniker of KJB (King James Bible) I ...Hm? With the moniker of KJB (King James Bible) I assume you have an affinity to KJB as being the "only" bible. So anecdotal evidence of the KJB being the only true bible probably spews forth from your lips. <br /><br />Is the Budwig diet 90% effective? I don't think so but there are many time Allopathic treatments are not 90% effective. History shows us that in 100 years peole will look back at chemo and think, how barbaric. So there may be knowledge to be gleaned from some alternative methods. <br /><br />My wife was in the hospital for three months with cancer. The meals they served cancer patients should have been criminal. Cake, ice cream, PBJ sandwiches that come in those pre-wrapped covers that have enough chemicals in them to last through the next 100 years. Good medicine? I don't think so.<br /><br />So I am not sure why you feel such animosity toward Budwig? Usually when people are so entrenched they have a hidden agenda. Often it is that darn money at the root.<br /><br />My wife's current oncologist is great. He has no problem with including dietary changes with the infusions. His position is to stay out of the hospital, it is a dangerous place to reside!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-47434582869180071742018-06-04T13:11:13.916-07:002018-06-04T13:11:13.916-07:00Dear Kristine,
Thank you for sharing your story. ...Dear Kristine,<br /><br />Thank you for sharing your story. I am so sorry that this has happened to you.<br /><br />In relation to the claim that one can manipulate the acidity of one's body by eating certain foods, please note:<br /><br />Some myths about cancer are surprisingly persistent, despite flying in the face of basic biology. One such idea is that overly ‘acidic’ diets cause your blood to become ‘too acidic’, which can increase your risk of cancer. Their proposed answer: increase your intake of healthier ‘alkaline’ foods like green vegetables and fruits (including, paradoxically, lemons).<br /><br />This is biological nonsense. True, cancer cells can’t live in an overly alkaline environment, but neither can any of the other cells in your body.<br />Blood is usually slightly alkaline. This is tightly regulated by the kidneys within a very narrow and perfectly healthy range. It can’t be changed for any meaningful amount of time by what you eat, and any extra acid or alkali is simply peed out in urine.<br />To maintain the correct balance within the body, your urine can and does change pH, depending on what you’ve eaten (explained in detail in this post). This can be seen by testing urine pH (acidity) after eating different foods and is the basis of the mistaken belief that diet can “make the body alkaline”. But that’s all you’re changing, and anyone who claims otherwise simply doesn’t understand how the body works. <br /><br />While eating lots of green veg is certainly healthy, that’s not because of any effect on how acid or alkaline your body is.<br /><br />There is something called acidosis. This is a physiological condition that happens when your kidneys and lungs can’t keep your body’s pH (a measure of acidity) in balance. It is often the result of serious illness or poisoning. It can be life-threatening and needs urgent medical attention, but it’s not down to overly acidic diets.<br /><br />We know that the immediate environment around cancer cells (the microenvironment) can become acidic. This is due to differences in the way that tumours create energy and use oxygen compared with healthy tissue. Researchers are working hard to understand how this happens, in order to develop more effective cancer treatments.<br /><br />But there’s no good evidence to prove that diet can manipulate whole body pH, or that it has an impact on cancer. (from: http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2014/03/24/dont-believe-the-hype-10-persistent-cancer-myths-debunked/)<br /><br />I hope, Kristine, that you are ready to meet God (as everyone, including everyone reading this comment section, must be). Please read:<br /><br />http://faithsaves.net/salvation/<br /><br /> and find out how you can be 100% sure about this matter.KJB1611https://www.blogger.com/profile/09696273086955004524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-37379429582088312742018-05-25T12:43:33.365-07:002018-05-25T12:43:33.365-07:00Andecdote:
I followed 'natural cures' for ...Andecdote:<br />I followed 'natural cures' for four years and felt truly great - vegan, mostly raw, green juices, coffee enemas etc) - after having been diagnosed with Stage 2 Triple Negative breast cancer, grade 3/4 ie. aggressive, (why did I start to give the disease capitals? - because it's a name, not a measure of its importance, silly). Not the Budwig Protocol although I had read about it. No diagnostic tests after the first set other than ultrasounds - my choice. I thought the 'alkalise and oxigenate your body' approach made sense, certainly to a non-scientist like me, given that apparently cancer thrives in an acidic, anaerobic environment. Then I slipped on ice and crashed onto my upper back. <br /><br />After four months of agony, I finally became paraplegic. Spinal cord surgery intervened and I slowly regained the use of my limbs. What had happened?<br /><br />Cunning cancer had crept into my spine. It ate away 8 vertebrae (4 cervical, 4 thoracic, consecutive) and the fall finished off the job.<br /><br />So! Now I was having radiation to kill the parts of the tumour they hadn't been able to remove. Then a year later, with cancer in my lungs and bones, I conceded to take chemotherapy tablets - not as a cure, but to try to slow down the speed of the progression and to reduce the pain. So now I've done all three - surgery, chemo and radiation.<br /><br />So? Well the so is - would I have been better to have bitten the bullet and taken chemo right at the start? Only God knows. I don't regret, but I do wonder. But I think chemo could possibly have saved my life and I wonder what I would have done without the internet putting forth the 'natural philosophy' and those 'healed' by following the 'natural path - God's way'. It seems many have been cured, in fact. Just not me! <br /><br />I lost so much weight I had to relinquish my green leaaves and eat 'dinners'! But it's fine. I'm still here, 5 years and 5 months later. Kristinenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-7820672519024807362017-08-06T08:45:13.062-07:002017-08-06T08:45:13.062-07:00Dear Mr. Bynum,
Thanks for the encouragement. I t...Dear Mr. Bynum,<br /><br />Thanks for the encouragement. I trust the article will indeed save lives; I think it may already have done so.<br /><br />KJB1611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-15532887509803926622017-08-05T17:56:22.890-07:002017-08-05T17:56:22.890-07:00I applaud you for writing this article. The attack...I applaud you for writing this article. The attacks against you, the numerous and varied logical fallacies and false equivalancies are astounding. It seems simple. There are treatments that have been demonstrated to be successful through rigorous methods, then there are those that provide anecdotal evidence and testimonials with no data to support the so-called treatment. Your patience with those attacking you is commendable. <br /><br />Unfortunately the people challenging you are themselves the ones most likely to be harmed by these alternative therapies. They will do as so many have done before, use the alternative until the cancer progresses beyond any hope. <br /><br />I never understood the claim that the entire medical community and the drug companies want to prevent real cures for cancer when these people and their loved ones would benefit from a cure. Making money is of no value if you die of cancer. <br /><br />It is a sad state that we have come to. People with little or no scientific understanding promote themselves as de facto experts. They assign evil motives to those who spend their lives trying to treat and cure their patents, and they offer this as opposed to real evidence. <br /><br />Again, I applaud you. I hope your message reaches someone and spares them an unnecessary and untimely death. Charles Bynumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12368975491078215324noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-1199502156815443542017-03-02T12:06:05.677-08:002017-03-02T12:06:05.677-08:00TDR is wrong again.
His blender idea won't t...TDR is wrong again. <br /><br />His blender idea won't test Budwig.<br /><br /> He should have paid attention to "Josh" who wrote:"I have been doing some reading and research on the BUDWIG protocol. It is actually much more than just eating cottage cheese and flaxseed oil."<br /><br />At the article Is the Budwig Protocol “just flaxseed oil and cottage cheese”? http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/budwig_protocol_vi.html<br />we find written, "The Budwig Protocol is a complete nutritional approach, and more, which besides flaxseed oil/cottage cheese [or quark] includes a number of elements which some other celebrated protocols use as their main approach to better health. It includes a vegetarian diet, lacto-vegan diet (except that fish is allowed), flaxseeds, fruit juices, vegetable juices, sauerkraut, sunshine, emotional and spiritual peace and stress control."<br /><br />Please don't retaliate by discussing the private affairs of you-know-who.<br /><br />PaulAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-68180830580629633302017-03-01T07:27:28.575-08:002017-03-01T07:27:28.575-08:00I don't think anyone method of treatment can n...I don't think anyone method of treatment can necessarily offer a guaranty of a cure. But on the other hand, many of the proponents of non-traditional treatment methods actually want people to be cured. Big Cancer doesn't necessarily care so much about any cures as much as they do about bleeding people dry financially. The industry in general is so corrupt, that it just baffles me how people can totally defend it and at the same time belittle and denigrate alternative therapies. People are just too, too gullible and naive, in my opinion, to put their trust in this industry.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-77939191488726695912017-03-01T07:14:26.092-08:002017-03-01T07:14:26.092-08:00How about instead of curing cancer, we try to prom...<br />How about instead of curing cancer, we try to promote nutrition and stop people from getting sick in the first place with all the junk in the modern diet? But even so, much of the ills of modern day life can actually be cured by non-conventional methods, but you would never be told this by Big Cancer. The industry wants you to live so they can bleed you dry financially with all sorts of their treatment methods, but they don't seem to have any vested interest in actual cures. <br /><br />Big Cancer and the medical-industrial complex has now started to call everything "pre" and start pushing pharmaceuticals for that as well. So, before you get hypertension or diabetes, or whatever, instead of trying to change your lifestyle to a more healthy one, just take a "pre (whatever)" pill and then take the real pill once you develop the full blown disease. The whole medical/pharmaceutical industry is so corrupt that it utterly baffles me how someone can stand up for them. (By the way, not every doctor or pharmacist is corrupt, of course. Many are legitimate and honest and ethical. I'm referring to the overall philosophy of the industry in general.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-46442663430132078882017-02-28T16:37:55.933-08:002017-02-28T16:37:55.933-08:00Here is an easy way to do a double blind test of t...Here is an easy way to do a double blind test of the Budwig Protocol. Take this stuff that people are supposed to eat with Budwig and put it into blenders. Then put something else in other blenders that looks the same and tastes the same but is simply healthy food that doesn't cure cancer. Give half the people in the clinical trial the one and half the people the other. If the people on the Budwig diet are cured of cancer 90% of the time, then it works. If they aren't, then it doesn't work. Why hasn't something like this been done? Because the Budwig Protocol doesn't cure cancer. Proponents don't even keep track of the dead bodies piling up.KJB1611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-19483587271068037132017-02-28T15:32:20.552-08:002017-02-28T15:32:20.552-08:00Fact-check: Did "Josh" say that "an...Fact-check: Did "Josh" say that "anecdotes prove nothing"?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />But, frankly the following statement has scared me, and I would guess "Josh" as well, into silence: <br /><br />"I would prefer not to be specific about any particular individuals who one or both or neither of us may or may not know."<br /><br />PaulAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-87146299147435033432017-02-28T14:05:55.277-08:002017-02-28T14:05:55.277-08:00Dear Josh,
I wrote the above before I read your l...Dear Josh,<br /><br />I wrote the above before I read your last comment. In relation to that comment, I agree that if one will only live two weeks longer (probably) and have a horrible life, one doesn't necessarily have to do what will make one live the extra two weeks.<br /><br />I also agree, of course, that anecdotes prove nothing--including my own.<br /><br />I would prefer not to be specific about any particular individuals who one or both or neither of us may or may not know.<br /><br />Doing something like Budwig that had no evidence for it violates the principle behind the sixth commandment, well summarized as:<br /><br />What are the Duties Required in the Sixth Commandment?<br /><br />Answer: The duties required in the sixth commandment are, all careful studies, and lawful endeavors, to preserve the life of ourselves and others by resisting all thoughts and purposes, subduing all passions, and avoiding all occasions, temptations, and practices, which tend to the unjust taking away the life of any; by just defense thereof against violence, patient bearing of the hand of God, quietness of mind, cheerfulness of spirit; a sober use of meat, drink, physic, sleep, labor, and recreations; by charitable thoughts, love, compassion, meekness, gentleness, kindness; peaceable, mild and courteous speeches and behavior; forbearance, readiness to be reconciled, patient bearing and forgiving of injuries, and requiting good for evil; comforting and succoring the distressed, and protecting and defending the innocent.<br /><br />What are the Sins Forbidden in the Sixth Commandment?<br /><br />Answer: The sins forbidden in the sixth commandment are, all taking away the life of ourselves, or of others, except in case of public justice, lawful war, or necessary defense; the neglecting or withdrawing the lawful and necessary means of preservation of life; sinful anger, hatred, envy, desire of revenge;all excessive passions, distracting cares; immoderate use of meat, drink, labor, and recreations; provoking words, oppression, quarreling, striking, wounding, and: Whatsoever else tends to the destruction of the life of any.<br /><br />Exposing the Budwig Protocol is also, therefore, obedience to the Sixth Commandment.<br /><br />Thanks.<br /><br />Dear Bro Robbins,<br /><br />I think YOU are probably getting paid off by Big Pharma too--in fact, you are probably diverting my checks, since they haven't been coming to my house, and I have been waiting and waiting and waiting.KJB1611https://www.blogger.com/profile/09696273086955004524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-4363761059598989512017-02-28T13:57:10.239-08:002017-02-28T13:57:10.239-08:00Dear Paul,
Yes, I forgive you.
Dear Josh,
Unfor...Dear Paul,<br /><br />Yes, I forgive you.<br /><br />Dear Josh,<br /><br />Unfortunately, there are many things that can kill cancer cells in a test tube (e. g., gasoline, ammonia, salt, etc.) that don't turn out to make effective cancer cures.<br /><br />Finally, if you believe that the way that I attempted to stop a precious saint of God from being deceived by the lie of the Budwig Protocol and tragically dying of the horrible disease of cancer was not gracious enough--and doubtless my indwelling sin affects all my words, actions, etc.--I hope that when you find out that your brother or sister in Christ is going to do something like this where his/her life is going to be thrown away, his/her ability to serve God on earth is going to be gone, and relatives and the body of Christ are going to be grieving over the person's tragic and needless death, that you do not say nothing, but attempt to stop that precious blood-bought one in a way that is better than the way I did. If that is so, that is wonderful, and I am glad.<br /><br />Thanks.KJB1611https://www.blogger.com/profile/09696273086955004524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-13608852806952525002017-02-28T13:16:31.038-08:002017-02-28T13:16:31.038-08:00Is anyone else 100% flummoxed by this post?? I do...Is anyone else 100% flummoxed by this post?? I don't have a clue what the Budwig protocol is, although from reading the comments, it must be a type of philosophy that says that man is responsible for his own health and can make other choices other than following the corrupt cancer-industrial complex. Is this post just a clever tactic to get us back to a theological topic and back to Calvinism? In other words, if we are sick, it's God's will, if we are well, it's God's will. We have no "choice" to "decide" to pursue or not to pursue any type of health care plan because we are all robots and man has no free will to think or do anything on his own? Is this the goal of this post? Maybe the point of this whole thread is that whether one supports the corrupt pharmaceutical-medical-complex or whether one believes in alternative philosophies, neither of them are right because everything is pre-determined ahead of time and we have no choice to do anything??? This whole thread is a mystery to me and that is just my guess.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-42853115109271666382017-02-28T13:12:39.579-08:002017-02-28T13:12:39.579-08:00Dear Thomas,
Maybe I can answer all your question...Dear Thomas,<br /><br />Maybe I can answer all your questions/replies in one post.<br /><br />First, I thank Paul for his comment above. I never said that Budwig couldn't be tested. That is not what you have previously called for. It would be great if they could do some "approved" testing to see if Budwig would slow down or even cure cancer. However as one oncologist said, "There is no cure for terminal cancer."<br /><br />Two, I do not think you are horrible for writing these kind of posts. Maybe overstepping your place when you tell somebody that you think they are breaking the sixth commandment by not following your approved method of treating cancer, but not horrible.<br /><br />Three, you never named anyone specifically by name, but you did publicly state, "I can think of one situation where the death of a godly woman now leaves a probably unsaved man raising their many children because of a rejection of scientific medicine." That is a public judgment call on the man's salvation without any proof or evidence for making such a claim. Does the man claim to be born again?<br /><br />Four, I find it ironic that you decry any anecdotal evidence, yet you say "I, at least personally, do not know a single person who clearly had a proven type of cancer who lived significantly longer through unconventional medicine than what was plausible if that person had just done nothing at all / had a placebo effect." I actually know a man who decided not to go with the recommended cure for what he was diagnosed with, because he was told it would only prolong his life for a very short time and that extended period of time would just be complete misery. He decided to go semi-alternative for awhile, only to find out that he had been misdiagnosed by the professionals originally. He then went back to "conventional" medicine once they properly diagnosed him. This is just anecdotal, so take it for what it is worth. However, play by the same rules. Just because you personally do not know of anyone that has been helped by what you call "unconventional" medicine, doesn't mean it hasn't happened.<br /><br />Overall, I think people need to be wise and balanced in the treatment they seek, and people (such as your self) need to be kind, caring, compassionate, prayerful, and understanding in regards to the course of treatment others choose for themselves or their family. Are some people to trusting of medicine that is not accepted by the "professionals"? YES! Are some people to trusting in the "mainstream, accepted" medical "professionals"? YES! I personally try to use all of the tools in this realm that God has provided - "conventional" and "non-conventional" (being very careful to stay clear of anything new age, superstitious, etc.)<br /><br />Josh<br />PS: I think Tyler's comment was actually kind of funny. :)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14875190127831976059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-85593179277903285202017-02-28T09:36:45.234-08:002017-02-28T09:36:45.234-08:00Mr. Ross, "Josh" did not say Budwig was ...Mr. Ross, "Josh" did not say Budwig was untestable. He wrote, <br /><br />" the BUDWIG protocol could never go through all of the double blind, randomised tests that you are suggesting. It just wouldn't work". <br /><br />Very different!<br /><br />Paul<br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-11345584316124284952017-02-28T08:31:32.921-08:002017-02-28T08:31:32.921-08:00Bro. Ross:
It appears you've hit the jackpot ...Bro. Ross:<br /><br />It appears you've hit the jackpot with this thread! Yikes . . .Tyler Robbinshttps://eccentricfundamentalist.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-78651954953299191232017-02-27T21:19:28.495-08:002017-02-27T21:19:28.495-08:00Dear Mr. Blog owner,
I like some of the stuff on ...Dear Mr. Blog owner,<br /><br />I like some of the stuff on your site. We all know you are not below in intelligence. That's why it is such a mystery why you promote the lies you have on your site concerning vaccines being harmless and not causing autism and why you are pro big-pharma. We are sorry if someone has threatened your life if you tell the truth. Wouldn't you feel better if you didn't give in to fear and were honest with us instead? Can you at least give us a hint why you are trying to pull off this charade? It would help us better understand.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-24877846946707259552017-02-27T21:12:57.503-08:002017-02-27T21:12:57.503-08:00This site has just proven itself to be a complete ...This site has just proven itself to be a complete and utter fraud. The pro-Big Pharma and the pro-Cancer-Industrial complex and the completely looney-tunes comments such as "vaccines don't cause autism" are just too much to even remotely take this site with a hint of credibility. But here's the rub, I don't think the owner of this site can claim to be as utterly naive as he looks. I find it hard to believe that anyone with a hint of honesty and intelligence could honesty believe this. I think this is an act. Was the owner of this site threatened in some way that he must not tell the truth about health on the site? Is it financial? Is he being paid to promote Big Pharma and the cancer-industrial complex? Anyone have any ideas?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-21063605473814288232017-02-27T20:23:36.985-08:002017-02-27T20:23:36.985-08:00Dear Josh,
Why can medical science determine by o...Dear Josh,<br /><br />Why can medical science determine by objective testing that eating more dark green leafy vegetables and less red meat, and getting regular exercise, tends to reduce the onset of certain types of cancer (but does not cure cancer if one already has it), but whether or not the Budwig Protocol cures cancer is untestable? Please explain.KJB1611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-84552260514180139092017-02-27T17:42:59.350-08:002017-02-27T17:42:59.350-08:00TDR,
I do not think you're horrible. I belie...TDR, <br /><br />I do not think you're horrible. I believe you mean well and have "good intentions". I don't understand why you reacted like I was attacking you (i'm sorry if something i wrote led you to this. will you forgive me?) when I was just asking for evidence. You still haven't given any.<br /><br />But I wonder, if there are not 500 people on Budwig, does it follow that 5 (or 3 or 1 for that matter) could not have been helped?<br /><br />PaulAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-8273677028082049992017-02-27T16:03:20.224-08:002017-02-27T16:03:20.224-08:00Dear Josh,
One more thing--I have no idea what yo...Dear Josh,<br /><br />One more thing--I have no idea what you are talking about concerning a public judgment call on people being unsaved. There are people who reject scientific medicine who are saved. That is part of the tragedy. If it was only murderers, gang members, drug dealers, etc. who went with the Budwig Protocol, it would not be nearly as bad as the dear people of God dying because of believing a lie (not that we don't want the murderers, etc. to repent and be saved, of course.)KJB1611https://www.blogger.com/profile/09696273086955004524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-77608044032875292252017-02-27T14:55:48.217-08:002017-02-27T14:55:48.217-08:00PS If Mr. Ross has made a "public judgment ca...PS If Mr. Ross has made a "public judgment call on (my) salvation", that's just sad. He should apologize. Maybe KAB should shut the comments down.<br /><br />PaulAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-37736629355693481462017-02-27T14:47:45.127-08:002017-02-27T14:47:45.127-08:00In my last comment, "factually correct" ...In my last comment, "factually correct" should read "factually incorrect" in that Thomas D. Ross was wrong about Mothers giving heroin to their children in 1750 or 1850.<br /><br />What if one can't afford chemo? Is Budwig okay then? Dr. Ross?<br /><br />Also, Dr. Ross criticizes me for all-caps ans exclamation points as if my use thereof was highlighting his red herring rather than my own. I am sorry for confusing him.<br /><br />Should i also apologize for doing anything that hasn't been run through a published double-blind study? We wait for Mr. Ross.<br /><br />Must I make a list of all he wrote about golden rice that Washington University's study disproves? He was wrong (exclamation point deleted for the easily offended)<br /><br />PaulAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-75908821659803303112017-02-27T14:23:21.050-08:002017-02-27T14:23:21.050-08:00By the way, if some people think I am horrible for...By the way, if some people think I am horrible for writing this blog post, but even one person's life is saved by not dying of cancer, that is worthwhile.<br /><br />Also, if one wants to eat a weird diet but actually does treatments for cancer that actually work, that is far better than rejecting cancer treatments that work and just eating a weird diet.<br /><br />Thanks.KJB1611https://www.blogger.com/profile/09696273086955004524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-38649083954148617372017-02-27T14:20:23.517-08:002017-02-27T14:20:23.517-08:00Dear Anonymous,
Vaccines do not cause autism. Pl...Dear Anonymous,<br /><br />Vaccines do not cause autism. Please see:<br /><br />http://www.autism-watch.org/<br /><br />https://www.quackwatch.com/03HealthPromotion/immu/autism.html<br /><br />Thanks.KJB1611https://www.blogger.com/profile/09696273086955004524noreply@blogger.com