tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post5834534172256621722..comments2023-12-22T08:29:29.230-08:00Comments on WHAT IS TRUTH: Criticizing Professor Wallace part twoKent Brandenburghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13419354741455959191noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-88050836068075232122016-11-17T14:47:28.891-08:002016-11-17T14:47:28.891-08:00If Matthew 5:18 is about scriptural preservation, ...If Matthew 5:18 is about scriptural preservation, then how would we apply "one jot or one tittle" to the situation, when no two manuscripts are exactly the same?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-50912009126423651592008-09-19T11:31:00.000-07:002008-09-19T11:31:00.000-07:00I wonder about laughing too and I do think of God ...I wonder about laughing too and I do think of God laughing in the end. It is to the level of laughing here in a certain sense. I can't get to the laughing level yet, but I understand someone laughing.<BR/><BR/>Your evaluation was right on though.Kent Brandenburghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13419354741455959191noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-53160629339726303362008-09-19T07:41:00.000-07:002008-09-19T07:41:00.000-07:00I laughed when I read this....But I was laughing a...I laughed when I read this....<BR/><BR/><BR/>But I was laughing at Wallace. I've never met him, and I'm sure he is brilliant. But it seems here that his scholarship is laughable. I don't know the proper terms but it seems like he was arguing against something that was not there by explaining away certain words that were not there in the first place.<BR/><BR/>Are we allowed to laugh at them (Psalm 2:4)? Or, is it only unbelievers that mock (2 Peter 3:3)?Jeff Voegtlinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16718288010688756299noreply@blogger.com