tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post4941104932785723448..comments2023-12-22T08:29:29.230-08:00Comments on WHAT IS TRUTH: Ability to Judge, Standard of Judgment, and Judging Effeminate Behavior (and Separating from It)Kent Brandenburghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13419354741455959191noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-7732248843038618472017-12-25T13:36:33.154-08:002017-12-25T13:36:33.154-08:00I left about everything of his. I think he's ...I left about everything of his. I think he's the same guy that says he's a business guru and success and super smart by his own estimation. He's got a version, his own, where he is the authority, that he accepts.<br /><br />Scripture says effeminate behavior for men is wrong, which means we can judge it. It's not the pant/skirt issue. He knows it too. People are voluntarily ignorant, like this is inaccessible. God says it isn't. The people that he says have a another way of looking at it, he doesn't identify. I don't see this even being dealt with. There is so much of it, that to deal with it would bring major changes. This commenter just wants men to remain effeminate, and when they are for God not to be able to judge them like God says he will. It's not loving to keep people ignorant on this. On top of that, it perpetuates effeminate behavior. It's going to continue, and here's someone who wants that to keep going.Kent Brandenburghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13419354741455959191noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20213892.post-22044604892691826992017-12-25T13:24:43.004-08:002017-12-25T13:24:43.004-08:00Hi,
I got a comment from a regular anonymous comm...Hi,<br /><br />I got a comment from a regular anonymous commenter, who likes to call names. I didn't think I should publish his comment anonymously with all the insults, and he has said in the past that he won't include his name. However, I thought was he wrote, minus the insults was interesting, so I'm publishing his comment, edited of the insults, although those may be his favorite part. They were funny to me, but I'm not including them. Here's the comment. <br /><br />They are all his words minus a few words and sentences.<br /><br />************************<br /><br />This is interesting. You don't realize the trap you are setting for yourself and then walking in to when you write this [bad writing]. Let's review:<br /><br />1) You claim that an unrepentent (sic, his spelling) effeminate person can't be saved.<br />2) You claim that you can judge who is effeminate and who is not. You have no choice of course. If it is true that effeminate people can't be saved, no just god would possibly not give us a ruler to measure effeminate behavior.<br /><br />The problem of course is that we don't have the ruler. You claim (as you always do) that you know what the standard should be but are too dense to understand that your "standards" are just your opinions based on your biases and experiences. You [don't know where] to draw the line on it. And furthermore, people smarter than you and more in tune with this issue will disagree with where you draw the line. And yet, in your [insult] mind, you are right and they are wrong.<br /><br />For you, it is as simple as [insult] issues like women wearing pants. Follow Kent's rules and you are cool. Kent knows where to draw the line. Even though Kent pulls those rules [insult].<br /><br />Frankly, if your version of Christianity was the only kind of Christianity, I would not be a Christian. No thinking person would be. You think it fine to call out effeminate people as such. Fine [he ends with a few sentences of insults].Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com